It is almost time to read expert predictions. You can still contribute. You almost certainly have better insights than the ones I offer here….
Read More… from Predictions 2016: Late Invite and Some Thoughts
In the latest in our series of articles on Schrems, Paul Bernal offers his views on the effect of the judgment and the context in which it should be seen…
Marion Oswald writes about the danger of anger and conflicting or simplistic argument obscuring the things that matter when serious issues surrounding the detail of the draft Investigatory Powers Bill need to be examined….
Read More… from The Draft Investigatory Powers Bill – Achieving a Good Faith Debate
Andrew Hooles thinks that we can. His article suggests several areas for improvement and is intended to be a call to action….
Julia Hörnle analyses the Schrems judgment in depth and considers its implications…
Read More… from The EU-US Safe Harbour Decision is Dead. Long Live its Successor?
Charles Drayson offers his thoughts on the future, inspired by the new book from Daniel and Richard Susskind, ‘The Future of the Professions’…
In the second of our series of articles on Schrems, Natasha Simmons takes a sober look at the judgment in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner and gives some practical guidance…
Read More… from Practical Advice in the Aftermath of Safe Harbour and the Schrems Ruling
Laurence Eastham reports on the Lecture from Dame Wendy Hall under the title ‘The Evolution of the Web: From the Wild West to a Brave New World?’…
The CJEU has ruled that the EU Commission’s Safe Harbor decision, that the USA ensures an adequate level of protection of the personal data transferred, is not conclusive of the issue….
Such has been the welter of reaction to the CJEU judgment ‘invalidating Safe Harbour’ that readers may find it useful to have a guide to some of the comments of value…